Friday, January 31, 2014

1/31 FRIDAY

Happy Friday.

1. Eyezzzzz p. 1
2. Shermannnnnn
3. Check out le novel.

(Oh yeah, you turned in the techniques today too. Yay).

Homework:
1. Read Ch. 1 and 2
2. Journal 1:  Identify two important choices Hurston makes in the first two chapters; these choices should be literary techniques. Then, for each choice, find examples (what), explain how Hurston treats the technique (how) and the effect of the technique. Your journal entry should NOT be in the form of a thesis but rather a FEW exploratory paragraphs. This assignment is meant to show your thought process, not necessarily be a summative assessment of your understanding of the text. That being said, to receive credit, you must show thoughtful, insightful work (and include examples from the text).
I would like the journal to be typed if possible.
3. 3-DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Projects due Wednesday. 

Thursday, January 30, 2014

THURRRRRRRRSDAY

Today in class we did the following:
1. Thesis
2. Harlem Renaissance/Stereotype Discussions
3. "White Man"
4. FX 4 LIFE!!!!!
Homework:
1. Definitions and examples for tomorrow.
2. Read the article that follows this post and answer the questions.
3. 3-D Projects due Wednesday

“America’s Racial Double Standard”
Following the NFC Championship game last weekend, Richard Sherman gave an interview to Erin Andrews.  He yelled to millions watching in their living rooms about being the best and shutting down opposing receiver Michael Crabtree.  However, following his interview, he somehow morphed from a football player who had just reached the pinnacle of sports achievement into a racial stereotype.
Suddenly he was “classless,” a “thug” from Compton, and any manner of other negative terms that one can substitute for the N-word.  Sherman was no longer human, but a racist caricature.
Black people exist in a “damned if we do, damned if we don’t” space within American conversation.  If a black person does something that’s seen as negative, that negative behavior is used as yet another example of how “we” are.  Negative behavior, so it goes, is just inherent in “us.”
On the flip side, if a black person achieves something positive, the positive achievement is often dismissed as either undeserved or the result of an innate gift the achiever can’t take credit for.  Many people believe President Obama only got into Harvard because of affirmative action, and just as many believe he was only elected into office (twice, no less) because he is black.  In sports, the success of white athletes is most often attributed to “smarts” and “hard work,” but the success of black athletes is often attributed to “natural ability” or “God-given” talent.
In 1999, when Brandi Chastain whipped off her shirt to celebrate the U.S. Women’s World Cup win, photos of her celebration landed her on the covers of Newsweek, Sports Illustrated and Time magazine.  She described her spontaneous action as “momentary insanity … the greatest moment of my career, and I lost control.” However, when the black men of the 2000 Olympics gold medal 4×100 team removed their shirts in celebration, they were called a “disgrace.” And Serena Williams was harshly criticized for doing a popular L.A. dance when she won her Olympic gold medal (and, as Gawker’s Cord Jefferson notes, called a “thug” when she argued with an ump).
When Ryan Lochte represents the U.S. on the international stage wearing grillz, it’s a fashion statement — all anyone wonders is “can he pull it off?”  However, Trayvon Martin is called a “thug” for wearing the exact same thing (google “Trayvon Martin grillz thug” and the same for Ryan Lochte).
And Richard Sherman, the high school salutatorian who graduated from Stanford with a 3.9 GPA, has now been reduced to an uneducated unsportsmanlike “thug” in the American lexicon for giving a passionate interview that some people didn’t like. Black hockey player Ray Emery was subjected to similar dismissiveness.  When he was involved with a fight with fellow goalie Braden Holtby, he was widely called a “thug,” a moniker never attributed to any of the dozens of white players who fight at nearly every hockey game.  And white players who break the hearts of opposing team’s fans with game-winning plays never get the kind of vitriol that was directed at Joel Ward for scoring the winning goal in a playoff game.

Simply recognizing that black people are viewed and treated differently from whites in America is not “playing the race card” (which is insulting to suggest, by the way).  It’s simply recognizing that, though we’ve made strides in this country, we still have work to do when it comes to breaking down barriers in people’s hearts and minds. When white fathers don’t cringe when their daughters bring home black men, when a young black kid wearing grillz is called fashionable before he’s called a “thug” and when Richard Sherman can yell about being the greatest, just as Ric Flair yelled for 30 years, then maybe we can begin thinking about that elusive “post-racial” society.  But, for now, I hope Richard Sherman is able to back up those words in a few weeks … with a Super Bowl ring in hand.
Beanie Barnes is a former collegiate athlete, socio-political commentator and entertainment industry professional. She holds a B.A. in Journalism from the University of Nebraska and an MBA from Yale University.

1.     What aspects of Barnes’ arguments do you agree with? What aspects of her argument do you disagree with?

  
2.     Compare Barnes’ interpretation of stereotypes of African Americans in the 21st Century with the stereotypes we discussed in class. What has changed since the 1920s? What hasn’t?



3.     Which school of thought would Barnes fall under had she been writing during the Harlem Renaissance (art as art, art as propaganda, back to Africa)?


Wednesday, January 29, 2014

WEDNESDAY!!!!!!!!!!

Today in class we:
1. Analyzed "America" and found too many examples of literary devices.
2. Introduced the what-how-effect form.
3. Harlem Renaissance introduction

Homework:
1. Write a new thesis for "America"
2. Lit Terms:
a. Terms/Definitions due Friday 1/31
b. 3-D Project due Weds 2/5
c. QUIZZZZZZZZZ on Friday 2/7

Through the use of concealed metaphor, combined with terse diction, Gary Miranda expresses the human desire to hide from the harsh realities of life and conveys that people cannot turn to "magic" for answers-- we must discover them for ourselves.

McKay's use juxtaposition and paradox creates a bittersweet tone about the nature of American society and a young person's life; he implies that the destruction of an oppressive society is inevitable.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Tuesday 1/28

Today in class we did the following:
1. Name things
2. Intro lit terms assignment
3. "America"
Homework:
1. Syllabus
2. Lit Terms Assignment
Terms due Friday (1/31); 3-D due Wednesday 2/5; Quiz on Friday 2/7

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Annotated Bibs

Hey friends. I've heard some of you are confused about the annotated bibliography. If you look back at your Stranger stuff, you should have an example of one about existentialism and absurdism.

Here are two examples (you'll not that for each, only one entry has the complete annotation-- you'll want to do that annotation for each)...

EXAMPLE 1:

Amber Manning and Lori Townzen
IB Teachin’
French Algeria: An Annotated Bibliography
Astier, Henri.  “The Deep Roots of French Secularism.”  BBC News Online. British Broadcasting Corporation. Web. 1 September 2004.

Evans, Martin. Algeria: France’s Undeclared War. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2012. Print

Heartfield, James.  The ‘Death of the Subject’ Explained. Sheffield Hallam University: 2006. Print.

Heggoy, Alf Andrew.  “Education in French Algeria: An Essay on Cultural Conflict.”  Comparative
Education Review Vol 17 No. 2. (June 1973): 180-197.  The University of Chicago Press.

Klein, Martin. Slavery and Colonial Rule in French West Africa. Cambridge University Press. 1998. Print.

Nelson, Harold D. Algeria, A Country of Study 4th edition. Washington D.C.: United States Army1984.
Print.

Zaretzky, Robert. Albert Camus: Elements of a Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010. Print.
Summary: The purpose of this book is to give a history of Camus’ life through his major political and philosophical shifts. As such, the beginning of the book really deals with the treatment of Arabs in Algeria because, during World War 2, Camus moved to France. The book begins with a comparison between the plight of the Arab in Algeria and the Irish people in British controlled, Ireland, arguing that both groups were oppressed by legislation and famine. Zaretzky then goes on to discuss Camus’ role in the plight of the Arab people, beginning with his involvement with the Communist party in 1935. At the time, the party supported the liberation of the Arab people, particularly in their defense of the French farmer Hodent. The author goes on to describe the many horrific scenes Camus witnessed with writing for an Algerian newspaper, scenes that depicted the horror of the lives of many Arab Algerians. Later, Zaretsky spends more time on Camus’ reaction to the Algerian revolution, demonstrating why Camus’ political struggles in France eventually led to a vow of silence over the revolution, despite his initial support for the Arab nationalists.
Evaluation: This text is fairly unbiased, though the author’s tone is certainly more critical of Sartre than Camus in his discussion of their feud. The author goes in very in-depth in the political and philosophical changes that Camus underwent but provides very little personal context for such transformations, making them harder to understand and contextualize.
Reflection: I found this text to be somewhat useful to my research because it certainly deals with the treatment of Arabs in French-occupied Algeria. That being said, the text is not focused on the plight of these people but rather Camus’ involvement with said plight. As Camus was a very prominent journalist in Algeria, his involvement was important. However, much of the book also deals with Camus’ increasing embrace of Absurdism and rejection of Communism; the author never connects these ideas to Camus’ role in Algeria, making the second half of the text less useful for my purposes.

EXAMPLE 2
Amber Manning
IB Livin’ Life & Stuff

Existentialism and Absurdism: An Annotated Bibliography
Aronson, Ronald, "Albert Camus", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition),    Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/camus/>.

Crowell, Steven, "Existentialism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/existentialism/>.

Genovese, Maria. “Meaningful Meaninglessness: Albert Camus’ Presentation of Absurdism as a Foundation for Goodness.” Digital Commons @ Salve Regina: Salve’s Dissertations and Theses. (2010): n. pag. Web. 18 February 2013.

Gutting, Gary. French Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Print.
Summary: The purpose of this book is to give a brief history of the schools of philosophy that developed in France from the 1890s to the end of the twentieth century. The text goes in-depth on a number of philosophical schools but deals largely with existentialism. Gutting also deals with absurdism but primarily in context of responses to existential thought. Gutting discusses at length much of the lead up to existentialism; he clarifies how both WWI and WWII influenced French philosophers to reject both moral and scientific explanations for the cause and purpose of human existence. Though primarily through a discussion of Sartre’s theories on existentialism, Gutting does introduce how Nietzche and Kierkegaard both helped to develop existentialism’s embrace of the human experience as opposed to theories about human essence and nature. The author’s primary argument regarding existentialism deals with the means of understanding “authenticity” and different philosopher’s views on the possibility of achieving “authenticity”. He often draws connections between authenticity and angst, demonstrating that angst is a natural part of existentialism and one that should be treated as such when understanding this school of thought. As for absurdism, Gutting introduces absurdism as a school of thought based primarily in humankind’s desire to understand the meaning of life and inability to do so.
Evaluation: This text is very straightforward and is not meant to really critique any form of philosophy. It is meant to be a history of French philosophy and the author clearly and thoroughly gives said history. Gutting is the chair of philosophy at Notre Dame, demonstrating his professional prestige; additionally, his books have been published by a myriad of scholarly journals and presses, proving his worth in the scholarly community. That being said, as Gutting is primarily a Foucault scholar, many of Foucault’s less important philosophical musings are given quite a bit of text and female philosophers (even de Beauvoir) are not examined as thoroughly.
Reflection: I found this text to be particularly useful to my research because it is expository in nature. As I was trying to find out the basic tenants and history of existentialism and absurdism, this book gave a great deal of information about both. However, as Gutting attempts to examine all schools of thought in French modern philosophy, he does not go as in-depth into absurdism, making the text more useful for an understanding of existentialism.

Martin, Andy. “Sartre and Camus in New York.” The Stone. July 2012. The New York Times. Web. 18 February 2013.



Thursday, April 11, 2013

THURSDAY!!!!!

Congratulations on successfully completing your first quarter of IB Junior English!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Today in class we turned in our Dystopian Projects and checked out Sophocles.

Homework: Read Sophocles' Antigone (quick read)

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Weds. April 10!!!!!!!!!

Your Dystopian projects are due TOMORROW! HOORAY!!!!!

P.S. Please bring your student ID with you to class tomorrow.